Skip navigation
Skip to contents Skip to top menu Skip to left menu
Korean

Font size

Journal Paper

Journal Paper

Journal Paper

Journal Paper
Year of Publication 2013 Division Asian Dust Research Division
Title Comparative Inverse Analysis of Satellite (MODIS) and Ground (PM) Observations to Estimate Dust Emissions in East Asia
Author 구본양
Coauthor
ISBN(ISSN) Name of Journal Asia-Pacific J. Atmos. Science
Category (International/Domestic) 국내 Vol. No. 49(1)
Research Project Title 황사 감시․예측기술 지원 및 활용연구(Ⅲ) Publication Date 2013-01-01
Keywords Inverse modeling, dust emission, aerosol optical depth (AOD), particulate matter (PM10), chemical transport model

Abstract

Soil dust aerosol is the largest contributor to aerosol mass concentrations in the troposphere and has considerable effects on air quality and climate. Arid and semi-arid areas of East Asia are one of the important dust source regions thus it is crucial to understand dust mobilization and accurately estimate dust emissions in East Asia.

However, present dust models still contain large uncertainties with dust emissions that remain a significant contributor to the overall uncertainties in the model. In this study, we attempt to reduce these uncertainties by using an inverse modeling technique and obtain optimized dust emissions. We use Moderate Resolution Imaging

Spectrometer (MODIS) aerosol optical depths (AODs) and groundbased mass concentrations of particles less than 10 μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM10) observations over East Asia in May 2007. The MODIS AODs are validated with AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) AODs. The inversion uses the maximum a posteriori method and the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model (CTM) as a forward model. The model error is large over dust source regions including the Gobi Desert and Mongolia. We find that inverse modeling analyses from the MODIS and PM10 observations

consistently result in decrease of dust emissions over Mongolia and the Gobi Desert. Whereas over the Taklamakan Desert and Manchuria, the inverse modeling analyses from both observations yield contrast results such as increase of dust sources using MODIS AODs, while decrease of those using PM10 observations. We discuss some limitations of both observations to obtain the optimized dust emissions and suggest several strategies for the improvement of dust emission

estimates in the model.

Related Data and Websites

/AE/CA/OP/TH/main.jsp